To all,
We are currently in the process of migrating from postgresql to SQL Server
2000 Enterprise for our data warehouse. There is a nice little sql call in
postgresql that allows me to dump the currently running queries on an
instance.
Select * from pg_stat_activity;
datid | datname | procpid | usesysid | usename |
current_query
| query_start
--+--+--+--+--+--
----
----
----
--+--
17142 | tripmaster | 11815 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:40.465191-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11811 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:25.351345-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11816 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:40.475562-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11722 | 100 | tripmaster | SELECT subage,
COUNT(DISTINCT(t1.session_key)), COUNT(DISTINCT(t1.userid_key)) FROM
f_pageviews t1 JOIN segmented_sub t0 ON (t1.userid_key = t0.id) WHERE
t1.date_key BETWEEN 640 AND 641 AND t1.newsletterid_key NOT IN (SELECT
newsletterid FROM t_newsconten | 2004-10-04 21:58:24.613488-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11817 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:40.486901-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11818 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:40.497608-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11819 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:59:00.59342-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11812 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:25.366206-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11813 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:25.381277-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11814 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
| 2004-10-04 21:58:25.395722-04
17142 | tripmaster | 11820 | 100 | tripmaster | select * from
pg_stat_activity;
| 2004-10-04 21:59:57.65278-04
pg_stat_activity is a system table used for gathering stats.
My question is there an equivalent sql statement or group of statements that
I could execute to get the same sort of info from sql server?
Thanks.
--seanHello ,
Look into the sysprocesses table in master database. But it will not show
the Queries . To get the queries you could use the function fn_getsql
(introduced in sql 2000 sp3). See books online for the usage of function.
Thanks
Hari
MCDBA
"Sean Shanny" <shannyconsulting@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:BD87780A.1A8C3%shannyconsulting@.earthlink.net...
> To all,
> We are currently in the process of migrating from postgresql to SQL Server
> 2000 Enterprise for our data warehouse. There is a nice little sql call
> in
> postgresql that allows me to dump the currently running queries on an
> instance.
> Select * from pg_stat_activity;
> datid | datname | procpid | usesysid | usename |
> current_query
> | query_start
> --+--+--+--+--+--
> ----
> ----
> ----
> --+--
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11815 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:40.465191-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11811 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:25.351345-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11816 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:40.475562-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11722 | 100 | tripmaster | SELECT subage,
> COUNT(DISTINCT(t1.session_key)), COUNT(DISTINCT(t1.userid_key)) FROM
> f_pageviews t1 JOIN segmented_sub t0 ON (t1.userid_key = t0.id) WHERE
> t1.date_key BETWEEN 640 AND 641 AND t1.newsletterid_key NOT IN (SELECT
> newsletterid FROM t_newsconten | 2004-10-04 21:58:24.613488-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11817 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:40.486901-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11818 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:40.497608-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11819 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:59:00.59342-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11812 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:25.366206-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11813 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:25.381277-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11814 | 100 | tripmaster | <IDLE>
> | 2004-10-04 21:58:25.395722-04
> 17142 | tripmaster | 11820 | 100 | tripmaster | select * from
> pg_stat_activity;
> | 2004-10-04 21:59:57.65278-04
>
> pg_stat_activity is a system table used for gathering stats.
> My question is there an equivalent sql statement or group of statements
> that
> I could execute to get the same sort of info from sql server?
> Thanks.
> --sean
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment